Jul 2, 2008

Why Don't Evolutionists Admit That Evidence For Darwinism Is So Sparse And Why Don't They Want To Discuss Finds That Might Lead In New Directions?

Why won't evolutionists just come out and admit that there is very, very little "evidence" for their theories?

They hold on to their ideas like it is a religion.

Here are just a couple of quotes that illustrate just how weak the evidence really is:

In 1982 Dr. Lyall Watson said: "The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!"

A 1994 article in Time Magazine admitted: "Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn't fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate."

And why won't evolutionists discuss the remarkable finds that ARE out there?

The photo above is of a giant human femur reportedly found in Turkey.

Why are these kinds of discoveries suppressed?

Because they don't fit into existing theories?

I thought we were all looking for the truth.

No comments:

Post a Comment